The Faculty Senate recently received an update on progress from the Academic Integrity Working Group (AIWG) regarding a proctoring pilot and broader academic integrity issues at Stanford University.
Jonathan Levin, the President of Stanford University, referenced a letter from the American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), stating, “I don’t disagree with the sentiments in that letter.” He emphasized the importance of universities engaging with criticism, mentioning, “To be clear, I do believe in working together with a broad array of peer institutions on actions to advance higher education.” Levin highlighted Stanford’s collaboration with the Association of American Universities and participation in legal actions related to federal funding cuts.
Brian Conrad, a math professor, questioned the provost about plans concerning the National Institutes of Health’s potential use of FIRE (Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) rankings for grant eligibility. Jenny Martinez, the Provost, affirmed Stanford’s support for academic freedom and stated research grants should rely on scientific merit. She confirmed, “Stanford has treated the procedures that are outlined in the 1974 Statement on Academic Freedom as binding on university administration.”
The AIWG was formed in winter 2024 after updates to Stanford’s Honor Code and Fundamental Standard. The working group is examining academic dishonesty, including its root causes, as well as piloting equitable proctoring methods. Jennifer Schwartz Poehlmann, a senior lecturer and Faculty Co-Chair of AIWG, explained the pilot’s expansion from seven to 28 courses and mentioned the establishment of a Centralized Testing Center for students needing accommodations.
The pilot entails updated proctoring guidelines, with practices such as ID verification and seating charts to assist proctors. Xavier Millan, the student co-chair, emphasized the need for clarity regarding course expectations, particularly concerning AI use.
Michael Tomz, a political science professor, inquired about measuring the AIWG’s impact. Poehlmann noted challenges in collecting reliable data due to rare reports of Honor Code violations and mentioned the use of survey data.
The AIWG plans to incorporate broader discussions on academic integrity, involving graduate students and various faculty disciplines. Concerns about proctoring bias were addressed by Millan, noting AIWG’s proctor training includes bias mitigation scenarios.
A memorial resolution was also heard for Dr. Saul Rosenberg, a prominent figure in cancer treatment, who passed away in 2022.
The Senate concluded with an executive session following the presentations.
